6.
Miscellaneous Situations
- What
is the legally significant difference between a large group of persons and
an indeterminate group of persons?
An indeterminate group is one whose membership
cannot be foreseen.
- Which
case formed the principle that the police owe no duty of care to
individual members of the public?
- What
alternative means of recovery is open to victims of torts which are also
crimes?
Compensation from the Criminal Injuries
Compensation Board
- What
was the public policy decision made in McKay v Essex AHA?
That someone cannot claim in tort for having
been born (a wrongful life claim).
- Is
there ever a duty to rescue in the tort of negligence?
Only where party has made some undertaking to
another, or where the law imposes such a duty (such as parents to their
children).
7. Breach
of Duty: The Standard of Care
- What
is the name of the objective test applied by the courts to establish
whether or not a defendant has breached his duty of care?
The “reasonable man” test
- What
is important about the fact that this test is objective rather than
subjective?
An objective test does not take the characteristics
of the particular defendant into account; he is held to an externally defined
standard.
- What
is the concept, used to describe a defendant's conduct, which is often
considered by the courts to balance out the taking of risks by that
defendant?
Utility
- Which
partial defence to a negligence action is governed by statute enacted by
Parliament in 1945?
Contributory Negligence — Law Reform
(Contributory Negligence) Act
- Which
test says that “A doctor is not guilty of negligence if he has acted in accordance
with a practice accepted as proper by a responsible body of medical men
skilled in that particular art”?
The Bolam test, from Bolam v Friern HMC
- Is
it true that the Bolam test applies only to professional doctors?
No, it is a test for professional individuals
in general.
- Which
case restricted the effects of the Bolam test?
Bolitho
v City & Hackney HA
- Which
technical term means “the facts speak for themselves”?
res
ipsa loquitur
- What
was the ratio of Nettleship v Weston?
That trainees and learners are subject to the
same standards of care as those experienced in the activity; the objective
test.
8.
Causation and Remoteness of Damage
- What
is the basic test for factual causation in the tort of negligence?
- What
is the standard of proof in the context of causation?
- What
is the remarkable effect of the decision in Chester v Afshar?
- What
were the defendants held liable for in Fairchild v Glenhaven
Funeral Services?
Materially increasing the risk that the
claimants would develop mesothelioma.
- What
is a novus actus interveniens?
An act which breaks the chain of causation
between the defendant's negligent act and the claimant's ultimate damage.
- Why
could the ‘but for’ test not be applied in Fairchild and Barker?
There was an evidentiary gap in that the court
did not have enough information about the way in which the disease was
contracted.
- Is
it true that the cases of Hotson v East Berkshire HA and Gregg
v Scottestablish that loss of a chance is never recoverable in the
tort of negligence?
No, loss of a chance is only irrecoverable in
the context of personal injury and medical negligence.
- What
is it that must be foreseeable under the rule in The Wagon Mound
(No. 1)?
The type or nature of the ultimate damage to
the claimant, i.e. not its
extent or how it happened.
- What
is the name of the rule which says that a tortfeasor must “take his victim
as he finds him”?
The thin skull or eggshell skull principle.
- Which
statute has partially reversed the effects of the House of Lords' decision
in Barker v Corus?
The Compensation Act 2006 (s.3)
9. Breach
of Statutory Duty
- What
is the name of the Law Commission Report on this area of the law?
Accidents at Work
- To
whom must the statutory duty be owed for a claim of this nature to succeed?
The individual claimant
- What
is the technical term for the defence based on a claimant's voluntarily
placing himself at risk of harm?
volenti
non fit injuria
- In
which case was the defendant held vicariously liable for breach of
statutory duty owed under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 s.3 by
one of its employees?
Majrowski
v Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust
- Which
statutory provision was challenged in Davies v Health and Safety
Executive?
Section 40 of the Health and Safety at Work
Act 1974
10.
Occupiers' Liability
- What
is the primary difference between the application of the Occupiers'
Liability Act 1957 and the Occupiers' Liability Act 1984?
The 1957 Act applies to lawful visitors and
the 1984 Act to those other than visitors.
- Is
it true that ‘visitors’ for the purposes of the Occupiers' Liability Act
1957 includes users of public or private rights of way?
No
- Which
statutory provision deals with the specific nature of the duty owed by
occupiers to children?
Section 2 (3) (a) of the Occupiers' Liability
Act 1957
- What
is the name of the principle applied to situations in which occupiers have
been deemed to allow children to be encouraged on to their land by a
particular feature of it?
The allurement principle
- Which
statute, usually of more relevance to the law of contract, can affect an
occupier's liability to affect his own liability?
The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977
- Is
it true that the provisions of UCTA apply only to business
occupiers?
Yes — private occupiers will be governed by
the common law relating to such terms.
- What,
for these purposes, is a ‘trespasser’?
A person whose presence on land is unknown to
the occupier or, if known, is objected to by the occupier in some practical
way.
- What
is the name of the statute enacted in order to balance public access to
common countryside with the rights of landowners?
- What
was the significance of the decision in Gwilliam v West
Hertfordshire Hospital NHS Trust?
That occupiers have a duty to inquire as to
the insured status of independent contractors on their land.
No comments:
Post a Comment