ROBBERY AND DACOITY
1.RELEVANT PROVSIONS (i) SEC.390AND 392
(ii) SEC.391AND 395 (2.) ROBBERY U/SEC.390 (I) WHEN THEFT AMOUNTS TO ROBBERY
(i) THEFT (A) MEANING OF THEFT U/SEC.378 (B) INGREDIENTS OF THEFT (ii) FEAR OF
DEATH,HURT OR WRONGFUL RESTRAINT (iii) FOR THE END SPECIFIED IN SEC.390
(iv)WHEN EXTORTION AMOUNTS TO ROBBERY (i) EXTORTION (A) MEANING OF EXTORTION
U/SEC.383 (i) PRESENCE OF PERSON PUT IN FEAR (EXEMPLE) (III) PUNISHMENT U/SEC.
392 (CASE LAW 2005 TLR 128) (3.)DECOITY
(I) INGREDIENTS (i) FIVE OR MORE PERSONS (ii) COMMITTING OR ATTEMTING TO COMMIT
ROBBERY (iii) COJOINTLY COMMITTING (II) PROOF OF DECOITY (III) PUNISHMENT U/SEC
395 (i) JURISDICTION OF COURT (4.) DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ROBBERY AND DACOITY(i) AS
TO PROVISION (ii) JURISDECTION OF COURT (iii) SERIOUSNESS (iv) POSITION OF ABETTORS
(v)Punishment (vi) POSITION IN HIGHWAY
5. CLOSING WORDS
No comments:
Post a Comment