Sunday, April 6, 2014

ABSOLUTE LIABILITY / STRICT LIABILITY PPC and Tort paper 5 and 6 for LLB part I Punjab Universty



consenso dato da un terzo ad un accordo intervenuto fra due o più altre parti
(Dott Coppola,Cons Min Lavoro e Previdenza Sociale,Roma)
EuroDicAutom

Consent: Informed  | aufgeklärte Einwilligung nach Aufklärung | consentement éclairé | assenso informato:

Informed consent is that consent obtained only after  full disclosure, i.e. after informing the defendant of the medical risks and benefits and alternatives of a medical procedure proposed by  a physician. It is a heightened form of consent applied in the field of medical practice to protect lay persons. See, e.g.
Tenuto v. Lederle Laboratories,
1997 N.Y. LEXIS 3219, *; 90 N.Y.2d 606;
687 N.E.2d 1300; 665 N.Y.S.2d 17

Consequential damages | Folgeschäden

Damages which arise not immediately after the initial injury but thereafter yet as a result of the tort. E.g. as a result of a libel the plaintiff cannot marry and so will not be an heir of their spouses parents. The lost inheritance could be seen as a consequential damage.

See: Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority v. Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority v. Laburnum Const. 195 Va. 827, 80 S.E.2d 574, 580.

Consortium, Loss of | Verlust des Liebespartners | privation de compagnie conjugale:

The loss of the ability to have normal sexual relations with one’s spouse, but also the loss of their services and companionship. It is a damage with both economic, though possibly unremunerated, and non-economic elements  - and one more example of damage inflation in the common law of torts.
See: Deems v. Westem Maryland Ry. Co., 247 Md. 95, 231 A.2d 514, 517.

Constitutional Torts | Verletzung verfassungsrechtlicher Freiheiten

While Germany and France have specialized courts for hearing constitutional cases this is not the case in the U.S. See Bivens Claim.

Constitution | Grundgesetz/Verfassung | Loi Fondamentale / Constitution:

Latin. constituere, to make to stand together, to establish. Originally, an important decree or edict. Later, the laws and usages which gave a government its characteristic features.

The fundamental law of the state (e.g., Grundgesetz)

The constitution of the state may refer literally to the legal arrangements which characterise the state or metaphorically to the institutions and relations of the organs of the state across time. We concern ourselves here with the former, that is the literal legal definition.

In the common law constitutions are termed either written or unwritten. The United Kingdom has an unwritten or customary constitution, whereas that of the United States is written. A written constitution can be the basis of judicial review, and under British rulings since Coke, an unwritten constitution cannot be the basis of judicial review.

Verfassung

die Gesamtheit der geschriebenen oder ungeschriebenen Rechtsnormen,welche die Grundordnung eines Staates festlegen

loi constitutionnelle / loi fondamentale / constitution

loi ou ensemble de lois fondamentales qui règle le mode de délégation ou d'exercice de la souveraineté nationale, la forme du  gouvernement, les attributions et le fonctionnement des pouvoirs de l'Etat ..

Contra bonos Mores / Against Good Morals | Sittenwidrig

No contract may be made which is against good morals. Such contracts are void as against public policy.

Contributory negligence | Part de responsabilité de la victime dans un accident / Négligence concurrente / Faute de la victime / Imprudence concurrente / négligence concurrente | Mitgefährdung :

Contributory negligence is that situation where the plaintiff’s own negligence helped bring about the tort. In most American jurisdictions it has been replaced with the doctrine of comparative fault. But in those jurisdictions where it survives, a finding of contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff will operate as a complete bar to he plaintiff’s claim. Contributory negligence is an affirmative defense which the defendant must plead and prove to prevail.
Corporation | Kapitalgesellschaft | Société Anonyme (à responsabilité limité)

A legally recognized person having a legal existence independent of its shareholders, officers, and employees. While the employees and officers may be liable for negligence the shareholders of the corporation are limited in liability for the torts of the corporation to the extent of their investment in the corporation.
Justice has been defined as giving each man his due. Justice may be distributive or commutative. Distributive justice distributes rewards and punishments to each one according to his merits, observing a just proportion by comparing one person or fact with another, so that neither equal persons have unequal things, nor unequal persons things equal. It is also known as geometric justice
Commutative justice renders to every one what belongs to him, as nearly as may be, or that which governs contracts. It is also known as arithmetic justice.
Internal justice is  the conformity of our will, and external justice the conformity of our actions to the law, at least where the law is just.
Creation of Risk | Gefährdung ???
A usage which has acquired the force of law.  When the usage is public, peaceable, uniform, general, continued, reasonable and certain, and has lasted since time immemorial it acquires the force of law and is known as a custom. While statute can and does replace prior custom, statutes must be interpreted in light of custom when there is doubt as to their meaning: optima est legum interpres consuetudo. A custom derives its force from the tacit consent of the legislature and the people
Customs can be general or particular customs. Particular customs are lex loci Particular customs are those which affect the inhabitants of some particular districts only.  The common law is an example of general custom, as is public international law.
Damages
Pecuniary compensation or indemity which may be recovered in the courts by any person who has suffered loss detriment or injury.
A general term for the remedy of a tort. Normally limited to monetary damages on a theory of compensation for the injured interest (either as valued by tort feasor or victim), but may also rely on a theory of retribution, deterrence/prevention or emotional satisfaction. In its broadest sense damages can imply remedies other than monetary.
There are a variety of types of damages. The various terms and their meanings are discussed below:
Damages awarded for calculable material injury; Damages deemed to compensate the injured party for losses sustained as a direct result of the injury suffered
Damages, Civil / Constitutional tort
Injuries sustained either to one's rights as a citizen of a State and of the United States, or else to his rights as a member of a family. See: Bivens Claim
Damages, compensation for | Schadensersatz | dommages et intérêts |   risarcimento dei danni
The compensation which the law will award for an injury done and thus a synonym for damages
Damages, Constructive
Those damages imputed in law from an act of wrong to another person. Such damages are imputed, i.e. they may or may not be related to the actual damages.
Damage, Compensatory (opp. To punitive damages) | Ersatz eines eingetretenen (materillen oder immateriellen) Schadens Ausgleichsentschädigung ? |  dommages-intérêts compensatoires / indemnité compensatrice | premio di compensazione
Compensatory damages are intended to remedy the actual damages caused by the party against whom they awarded. Thus compensatory damages are an award of money intended to be exactly equal to the injury of the victim and nothing more. Yet they may include the abstract compensation for pain and suffering. Nevertheless compensatory damages do not include punitive damages (q.v.)  .
Damages, Consequential | Folgeschaden (aus Primärschaden)/ Indirekter Schaden | dommage consécutif / dommages secondaires / dommage indirect
Those damages which do not arise immadiately out of the plaintiff’s tort but which nevertheless are caused by the tort.
See: mitigation of damages, pure economic loss
At common law where two or more tortfeasors are together the wrongful cause of plaintiffs injury, the plaintiff would have a cause of action against either for the entire amount of his or her damages. A possible reform which has not yet been broadly adopted would be to divide the damage award against each defendant in proportion to their fault.
Damages, exemplary | Exemplarischer Schadensersatz |  dommages-intérêts exemplaires |  risarcimento danni
A synonym for punitive damages. Exemplary damages are those damages arising out of the defendant's willful acts where such acts are ere malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton or grossly reckless. The justification of examplary damages is primarily punishment of the individual and deterrence of other individuals but secondarily as a form of compensation. In some cases of outrageous conduct, e.g. fraud, sexual abuse, or other intentional torts, the exemplary damages can be much greater than the actual damages.
Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co., 119 Cal.App.3d 757; 1981 Cal.App. Lexis 1859; 174 Cal.Reptr. 348
Damages, General | Ersatz eines immateriallen Schadens | Courants danni generici
Those damages which ordinarily flow from the tortious conduct and thus need not be specifically pleaded as they are implicit in the plaintiffs complaint. Having proven the underlying act, the ordinary damages flowing therefrom are presumed, though such proof may be refuted at least in the case of libel. Though there is no necessary correspondance between general damages and primary injury and special damages and consequential damages that correspondance often occurs in fact. In fact prudence dictates that plaintiff’s plead all damages as special damages to avoid losing their substantive rights due to the procedural distinction between general and special damages.
Damages intended to compensate plaintiffs for the lost pleasure resulting from the injury. As hedonic damages inflate compensation and compensate an abstraction they are not recognized in all jurisdictions.
Monetary or pecuniary damages are those damages to the fortune of the victim. As such damages are concrete and material they are more easily measured than abstract rights (e.g. future contingent streams of income such as from a patent) or subjective emotions (pain and suffering).
The method used to calculate the damages sustained by the injured party.
Damages, Mitigation of | Obligation de limiter les dommages
The victim of a tort-feasor, though a victim, nonethless has an affirmative duty to do their best to reduce the damages consequent to the tortious misconduct. That duty is known as the duty to mitigate damages. The victim must take advantage of any reasonable opportunity he may have had under the circumstances to reduce or minimize the loss or damage.
The culpability of the defendant is irrelevant to the plaintiff’s duty to mitigate the damages. Defendants may thus raise the failure of the plaintiff to mitigate the damages as an affirmative defense not to the finding of liability but to the determination of the extent of damages.
For example, plaintiff who due to injury loses her job must nonetheless seek a new one but will be compensated for any lost wages and probably also (depending on the facts of the case) for their reduced income if the new employment pays less than the old.
A trivial sum awarded where only a breach of duty was shown with however no showing of damages or where the damages are minute. Such damages, generally of a small amount (e.g. one dollar) are a symbolic form of satisfaction and recognition of the abstract right of the plaintiff where no measurable loss arising from the injury is averred or proven.
Damages for pain, suffering, loss of companionship, and loss of consortium (love of spouse). Unlike concrete material economic losses, such as lost wages, medical bills, and damage to property such damages are abstract. Non-economic damages may be limited by statute.
Injuries to the plaintiff’s sense of well being; The non material damages to a victim of a tort which are remedied with money under a theory of compensation
Pure motional damages, where allowed, are generally only allowed to immediate relatives. However in cases where the defendant is in close proximity to a violent accident and thus felt themselves in danger pure emotional damages will be permitted. Further emotional damages for pain and suffering in addition to and as a result of some substantive material damages will also be allowed.
See also: intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent infliction of emotional distress.
Damage per se / actionable per se | Eine Rechtsgutsverletzung wird einem kompensationsfähigen Schaden gleichgesetzt
A damage per se is one wherein damages are presumed upon occurrence of the tort, e.g. in cases of libel where the libel concerns imputation of crime, a loathsome disease, the unchastity of a woman, or words affecting the plaintiffs trade, business or profession. However per se damages may be able to be refuted by the defendant who will then bear the burden of proof for his affirmative defense.
Damages, presumedDamages which do not require proof as they are presumed as a matter of law to result naturally and necessarily from a tortious actDamages, punitive  | dommages-intérêts punitifs See also: exemplary damages (syn.)
Punitive damages are those damages awarded in case of willful, wanton, or malicious conduct. They may even be available in cases of reckless negligence if the damages are particularly severe or in cases of fraudulent acts. Punitive damages serve to punish the defendant and deter others. The plaintiff must prove both the necessity and extent of punitive damages according to the ordinary standard of a  preponderance of the evidence. Conduct is malicious if it is accompanied by ill will, or spite, or if it is for the purpose of injuring another. Conduct is reckless if it reflects a complete indifference to the safety and rights of others.
Those damages which do not arise ordinarily out of the injury but which arise extraordinarily and thus must be specifically plead and proven. Such damages are nonetheless concrete and material as opposed to abstract. That is they are calculable in economic terms. Special damages must be plead and proven in cases of slander. E.g. a plaintiff’s has been burgled, and as a consequence must seek lodging elsewhere. This consequential damage, having to pay a hotelier, must be specially plead and proven.
Sometimes the special damage is said to constitute the substance of the action itself; for example, in an action wherein the plaintiff declares for slanderous words, which of themselves are not a sufficient ground or foundation for the suit, if any particular damage result to the plaintiff from the speaking of them, that damage is properly said to be the substance of the action.
Special damages can include medical bills, repair and replacement of property, lost wages and other concrete damages which are not abstract speculative or subjective.
Treble damages is the measure for an award of punitive damages. The actual calculation of punitive damages is not fixed according to a formula and must in all cases be proven by the plaintiff, first as to existence, second as to extent. However those damages can be as high as three times the substantive damages plus the plaintiffs attorney’s fees and costs. Treble damages may also be governed by statute which may abrogate the common law rule.E.g., if a jury awards twenty dollars damages and punitive damages would be forty dollars more. However the construction of treble damages is different from that of treble costs.
Treble costs are sometimes awarded by statutes. When an act awards treble costs, the party is allowed three times the usual costs, excepting the fees and costs of their attorney which are not trebled.
Damnum sine injuria Literally condemnation without injury, often mis-translated as damages with no injury but in fact would be better translated as injury (a wrong) with no damages (a measure).Refers to the legal situation in which plaintiff’s right is not respected by another but where the breach of plaintiff’s right does not cause a damage, or at least not a calculable or admissible damage. A finding of damnum sine injuria can be the basis for a finding of nominal damages (q.v.)
Deceit is a tort of fradulent misrepresentations: it’s elements are:
1) A fraudulent statement
2) Made with intent to decieve
3) Which induces reliance on the part of the plaintiff
4) And results in injury to the plaintiff.
The tort will also lie where the statement was made with reckless disregard as to its truth or falsehood.
Deceit is similar to the tort of passing off; however in the tort of deceit the injured plaintiff is a consumer, and in the tort of passing off the injured plaintiff is a competitor.In some jurisdiction deceit or fraud is a statutory tort and includes an action against false advertising.
Communication to third parties of false statements about a person such that the statements injure the person’s reputation or dissuade others from associating with them.There are two forms of defamation, slander, which is oral and libel which is written. In cases of slander,  damages must be proven, but in cases of libel damages are not presumed and must be proven.Truth is a defence to an accusation of defamation.This tort corresponds, roughly, to the German torts of Verleumdung, üble Nachrede, and Beleidigung.
Beleidigung is a more extensive injury than defamation and includes words which are insulting or emotionally injurious.At common law in England a court could order the defaming defendant to offer an apology.
Public figures, including officeholders and candidates, have to show that the defamation was made with malicious intent and was not just fair comment.

No comments:

Post a Comment